private beta

Your architecture diagram is lying.

Unbound discovers the hidden dependencies connecting your software systems — before they become outages.

built for complex production systems
Coupling matrix0 of 7 hidden couplings
api
auth
billing
search
data
worker
analytics
notify
api
auth
billing
search
data
worker
analytics
notify
declared discovered at runtimeidle
The problem

The dependency graph nobody maintains.

Modern systems accumulate dependencies that never appear in architecture documentation: undocumented APIs, shared databases, schema assumptions, auth flows, cron jobs and operational workarounds. The diagram stops being true the week after it is drawn.

Declaredarchitecture.md
  • API → Billing
  • API → Search
  • Worker → Data

3 edges

Observed runtime
  • API → Billing
  • API → Search
  • API → Authundeclared
  • Billing → Shared DBundeclared
  • Worker → Data
  • Search → undocumented schemaundeclared
  • Analytics → Workerundeclared
  • Auth → legacy serviceundeclared

8 edges · 5 invisible

Code tells you what can connect. Runtime behavior tells you what actually does.

Product

Unbound reconstructs the real system.

01

Discover

Continuously analyze source code, runtime telemetry, infrastructure configuration, schemas, APIs, and service behavior.

02

Infer

Use AI to identify relationships that conventional dependency scanners cannot see.

03

Explain

Every discovered dependency includes evidence explaining why Unbound believes the relationship exists.

04

Simulate

Model the blast radius of removing, changing, or degrading a service.

simulation · blast radius
Remove
payments-db

simulating removal across 4 environments…

Potential impact
147
services
32
scheduled jobs
19
data pipelines
8
undocumented integrations
Graph query

Ask the graph.

Query the reconstructed system directly. Results return as graph nodes, supporting evidence and impact estimates — not prose.

unbound / query graph synced
Result nodes
api-gatewayhard fail
checkout-servicedegraded
admin-consolehard fail
batch-reconcilerdelayed
Evidence
  • token validation trace
  • sidecar call graph
  • incident 2026-04-11 correlation
impact › 23 services · 4 regions · p0 within 90s
Evidence

No black-box answers.

Unbound never simply claims that two services are connected. Every inferred relationship is traceable back to the underlying signals — the traces, schemas and deployment history that produced it. You can audit the reasoning, not just the conclusion.

Discovered dependencyinferred
checkout-servicecustomer-db
Confidence94%
Evidence
  • runtime query pattern1.2M matched calls / 30d
  • shared schema referencecustomers.v3 · 14 columns
  • production tracetrace-id 8f2a…c41 · 312ms
  • historical deployment correlation9 co-incident rollouts
Use cases

Built for complex production systems.

01

Incident Response

Understand the real blast radius before making changes during an incident.

02

Infrastructure Migration

Identify hidden dependencies before moving databases, services, or infrastructure.

03

Architecture Governance

Continuously maintain an architecture graph from actual system behavior.

04

Engineering Risk

Detect undocumented coupling before it becomes an operational failure.

Differentiation

Not another dependency scanner.

Traditional tools
  • Declared dependencies
  • Static analysis
  • Known APIs
  • Manual architecture
Unbound
  • Runtime behavior
  • Implicit coupling
  • Historical patterns
  • Infrastructure signals
  • AI-inferred relationships
Architecture

Connected to the systems that tell the truth.

Sources
Git repositories
Kubernetes
Cloud infrastructure
Databases
APIs
Observability
CI/CD
Runtime traces
Unbound Intelligence Engine
Outputs
Dependency Graph
Risk Graph
Blast Radius
Change Detection

Early access for infrastructure teams

See what your architecture missed.

Join the private beta and map the dependencies hiding inside your production systems.